I've been thinking about how some people have an emotional depth while others have less or none... I wonder why we are so different? Some have so much of it, so there's a sense of communication, a mutual understanding. Others are scratching the surface, and there are ones that can't connect with others this way at all. I mean all things including romance, joy and sadness, humor. And I was thinking of how g factor was supposed to include all of it, not just the cold facts and calculation speed and so on... cause some people can be so good at those things, and they all correlate with each other, and yet they can be so empty when it comes to emotions. I guess this is why they came up with emotional intelligence, but isn't it imperfect to handle the two separately? Can't we just have one scale for it all? Isn't intelligence a faulty, incomplete attempt to describe the "goodness" of a person, if it can't predict and measure how developed they are emotionally?